About Team Business Press Partner Contact Us
There hasn’t been this much tension & excitement in Singapore’s technology startup scene since Creative speakers were the best thing since sliced bread.
For those of you dwelling under rocks, here’s the story in a snap. Small Singapore startup, Fusion Garage, meets US online media juggernaut, TechCrunch, to build the world’s NEXT BIG consumer gadget – a tablet PC of sorts – named the CrunchPad. After ~2 years of work, the project crashes and burns amidst tales of secrecy, deceit, backstabbing, IP theft and the obligatory lawsuits. Spy action-worthy u say? We say just another interwebs soap opera :)
Much speculation abounds after TechCrunch’s Mike Arrington broke news of the deal failure. The finger-pointing game started and as usual, the twittersphere and blogosphere were first to step up to the jury bench. Blame has been pinned on Chandrasekhar and perhaps the secretive shareholders behind Fusion Garage. The online twitter and blog sphere has gone wild, even going as far as calling Chandrasekhar a “man-weasel”. We decided to snoop around to do some research of our own. What we came up with adds even more masala to this already spicy situation.
The Lone Shareholder?
We wanted to know who are the shareholders behind Fusion Garage. A quick check, conducted December 1 2009, with an official Singapore company directory yielded the following results:
Shareholder(s) of Fusion Garage Private Limited: Arulampalam Senthy Rani
Address: 458, Choa Chu Kang Avenue 4, Singapore.
Shareholding: 1,000,000 of 1,000,000 shares (100%).
There are NO other shareholders in Fusion Garage based on the document! Based on Arringon’s post, we understand that the email sent to Arrington was sent by “one of his shareholders”. Meaning that Fusion Garage had more than 1 shareholder, something you would typically expect for a technology company at this stage. But in this case, it was just 1 shareholder. Who is this lone shareholder? A quick Google search yielded nothing as well. We cross checked with some friends only to realize that the name belongs to a female person. We decided to dig further to check out Radixs, Chandrasekhar’s previous startup, to see if there were any clues there.
Shareholder(s) of Radixs Pte Ltd: Chandrasekar Rathakrishnan (No surprise here!)
Address: 458, Choa Chua Kang Avenue 4, Singapore. (same address as Arulampalam Senthy Rani)
Could it be that the shareholder of Fusion Garage is a family member of Chandrasekhar? If so, then it does seem that Chandrasekar’s family member is the real sole owner of Fusion Garage who entered into a formal business agreement with TechCrunch. Did TechCrunch know about this? Curious indeed.
Jealousy Killed the TechCrunch-Fusion Garage Relationship?
Who really made the Crunchpad? TechCrunch? Fusion Garage? Or both? We know all along how Arrington has longed for a tablet PC for him to surf the Internet, while lying on the couch. It was allegedly his idea and vision from the start.
Sept 2008 — Sometime around TechCrunch50 2008, Chandra and Arrington met and the love story began.
After Oct 2008 — Fusion Garage were reportedly involved into the Crunchpad project and they worked on it secretly.
Jan 2009 — Their secret love story went was publicly announced for the first time on Jan 19th. Arrington mentioned that “The software has been created by Singapore-based Fusion Garage, who continue to work with Louis on the feature set and user experience”. It was very clear then that the entire project and hardware was run by TechCrunch, with the software component done by Fusion Garage. This, coincidentally, is the exact same date which Fusion Garage got out of stealth mode, which they openly announced on their blog (the link leads to the Google cache of the blog. Scroll all the way down for the post). Today Online (a Singapore newspaper) picked this up and the focus again was on TechCrunch being in the pilot’s seat, with Fusion Garage having a more supporting role instead.
May 2009 – Chandra misses unConference 2009 as he is still working on the CrunchPad project with Arrington in US.
July 2009 — Straits Times (Singapore’s #1 newspaper) features Fusion Garage with the tagline “Set to launch tablet PC: Singapore firm launches touchscreen tablet computer”. This was a major flashpoint, we believe. See Mike Arrington’s tweet and this. The fact that the article was unilaterally blasted by Mike Arrington boiled to the early fissures in the communication relationship with TechCrunch & Fusion Garage. Was this the public beginnings of a turf war for the manufacturer Fusion Garage to plant their stake on this project? Anyhow, its ironic that Mike Arrington condemned this leak from his business partner, having being the beneficiary of many corporate leaks in the past (think Yahoo, Twitter, Facebook etc).
Aug 2009 — Nik Cubrilovic, CTO of TechCrunch, arrives in Singapore. All’s good so far, but could there have been something internally brewing unknown to the rest of us.
Nov 2009 — The CrunchPad is dead!
Based on basic PR analysis above (from both US & Singapore), it appears that the early warning signs were there before the Crunchpad’s proclaimed death. Its a huge pity that such a product with so much pre-release hype, reminiscient of Apple products, cannot come to fruition. Its also a sobering reminder to all parties that hardware is truly a cold hard bitch. The saga is far from over ladies and gentlemen. In fact, the most exciting part, will be Fusion Garage’s official response. Something we’re all looking forward to!
Disclosures: e27 hosted TechCrunch CTO Nik Cubrilovic in August this year during his visit to Singapore (link). e27 is also linked to Fusion Garage’s Founder and CEO, Chandrasekar Rathakrishnan, by way of his status as a guest speaker at our unConference this year, which was in turn given to his colleagues at Fusion Garage due to his work commitments in US. e27 has also blogged about Chandrasekhar’s previous startup. A joint article by Mohan Belani and Bjorn Lee.
© 2006-2010 Entrepreneur 27 Singapore: Web 2.0 Unconferences, Sites & Cool Tech
Use of this site is subject to terms of use, which prohibit commercial use of this site.
By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms.
57 Responses to “Who Really Killed the Crunchpad?”
allenbrunson said :
i would love read an article that answered the question posed by the title. sadly, the linked article isn’t it.
This comment was originally posted on Hacker News
allenbrunson said :
i would love read an article that answered the question posed by the title. sadly, this isn’t it.
This comment was originally posted on Hacker News
Ash said :
Great detective work. I like! (The way Borat says it)
YCHackerNews said :
Who Really Killed the Crunchpad?: http://bit.ly/4SL0sJ Comments: http://bit.ly/5QETzl
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
hongting said :
The saga continues… RT @e27sg Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
WebStartupGroup said :
StartupNews: Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/5BQwXG
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Tweets that mention Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? » e27 – Discovering Web Innovation in Asia -- Topsy.com said :
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Web Startup Group and Hong Ting, YC Hacker News. YC Hacker News said: Who Really Killed the Crunchpad?: http://bit.ly/4SL0sJ Comments: http://bit.ly/5QETzl [...]
jvdh said :
The only interesting bit from this article is that there seems to be only one shareholder of Fusion Garage, while it was previously suggested there were more.The rest of the article is mostly hear-say and conjecture.
This comment was originally posted on Hacker News
elblanco said :
Still hoping to find out, just not here.
This comment was originally posted on Hacker News
fhars said :
More raw material to invent hearsay: that is the address shared by the founder and the sharehoder:http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=de&…
This comment was originally posted on Hacker News
jcapote said :
How do we even know it was alive to begin with?
This comment was originally posted on Hacker News
geekonomics said :
More info on the Crunchpad Saga http://bit.ly/6TgdTo via @e27sg
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
mhisham said :
No replies from FG though. hmmm RT @e27sg Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Mohd Hisham said :
There is some words out on the streets that, FG is probably using the age-old Singapore (& Singapore Govt) tactics of playing dumb, let it all settle down & disappear from the ever-fickle minded Internet users.
raminedarabiha said :
Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://ff.im/-coISm
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
uberVU - social comments said :
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by hongting: The saga continues… RT @e27sg Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo…
andycroll said :
Good work by @e27sg http://bit.ly/4TtCcn I thought of a bizfile lookup but was too tight to spend the $15!
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
sswong said :
RT @YCHackerNews: Who Really Killed the Crunchpad?: http://bit.ly/4SL0sJ Comments: http://bit.ly/5QETzl
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
E27sg said :
Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
chiewmei said :
the crunchpad-saga in a nutshell. RT @E27sg: Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
winstonyw said :
RT @E27sg: Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
paikia said :
RT @E27sg: Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
LukeInTH said :
RT @E27sg: Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
thescratt said :
RT @LukeInTH: RT @E27sg: Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
altf said :
who really killed the crunchpad? | http://www.e27.sg/2009/12/03/who-really-killed-the-crunchpad/
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
malique said :
Great read, but whats the conclusion? whodunnit? RT @E27sg: Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
jerry limonta said :
The Crunchpad is dead long live the Courier: http://www.ereaderuniverse.com/page/microsoft-courier
spaceactionhero said :
no answers only more questions RT @malique: whats the conclusion? RT @E27sg: Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
sswong said :
RT @E27sg: Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
peisaiheng said :
“hasn’t been this much tension & excitement in Sg’s technology startup” RT @e27sg Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
rampok said :
Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo (via @e27sg)
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
aulia said :
Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo /via @e27sg
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
fankeow said :
RT @E27sg: Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Kpacu » Blog Archive » Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? » e27 – Discovering Web … said :
[...] the original post: Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? » e27 – Discovering Web … Category: Tech news Tags: build-the, build-the-world, case, fusion, fusion-garage, lone, [...]
snehamenon said :
RT @e27sg Who really killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/4TtCcn
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Vin Nair said :
like the first guy said.. doesnt really answer the question. :P
rampok said :
i wonder what would @arrington say after reading this. Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/4TtCcn
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Varun said :
The “1 shareholder” point could be COMPLETELY off the mark if RCPS shareholding is not required to be listed by ACRA. Could someone confirm this please?
- V.
(RCPS = Redeemable Convertible Preference Shares – what all founders love to hate and what all investors love to love).
Mohan Belani said :
@Varun: You’re right on this! We just found out from one of the co-founders at Radixs that Chandra has a habit of doing this (this was done at Radixs as well).
Varun said :
Well then I’m afraid the base of the investigative report just got shot down… ;-)
Really, I remember Chandra as a nice and well-liked guy (he was helping me choose a US PR agency when HomeCamera was part of M1). Driven, out to change the world, sometimes taking up what lesser mortals like me would consider impossible particularly given the competitive space (Radixs), but never as duplicitous / fraudulent. He got screwed over by his investors at Radixs (or perhaps they decided it really was impossible and decided to cut their losses) and might’ve been backed into a sticky corner again.
I’m deeply disappointed with anti-Chandra tirade, without hearing his side of the story (but then that’s human nature for you). Not that it’s any of my business anyway, but this has become a modern-day Web soap, and now we’re all following it. The only thing that truly surprises me is that “Webarazzi” didn’t hang out near his office to try and force a response.
There’s also a lesson in this saga for us. If you’re GOING to do something that has a POSSIBILITY of creating a public backlash, be prepared with your own PR assault WELL IN ADVANCE and not as a REACTION. (Chandra, if you’re reading this, sorry mate, but you should’ve been ready with a response earlier, not having left it so late… and all the very best to you mate.)
- V.
Daniel said :
It’s hard to hear someone’s side of the story when they refuse to tell it.
shenheng said :
wonder if @leolaporte will talk abt it on @twitlive this Sunday RE: @E27sg’s post Who Really Killed #crunchpad http://bit.ly/8KmVVy
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
shenheng said :
wonder if @leolaporte will talk abt it on @twitlive this Sunday RE: @E27sg’s post Who Really Killed #crunchpad http://bit.ly/8KmVVy
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Mohan Belani said :
@Varun: Not true. We have yet to find out the basis for this arrangement, that too considering that the company has been operating for over a year and TC was going to acquire them at a point in time. The big qns here is did TC know about this issue and if yes, why did they go ahead with working with Fusion Garage. We have yet to know the answer to that.
One other thing we need to make very clear here Varun, this isn’t a tirade against Chandra. In fact, we spoke to Chandra before publishing this to make it clear to him what our intentions were. He was personally aware of this article going out before it did. This is an attempt to paint the facts because there has been way too much speculation going on. The first point demonstrates the company’s unique shareholding structure, and the question here is that did TC knowingly go into an agreement despite knowing this. The second point clearly shows the power struggle between Arrington and Chandra and how the PR debacle over the Crunchpad unfolded. Be clear to note that we have not taken sides here neither have we put Chandra down for his actions. As clearly spelt out in our disclosures, we are close to both parties. Yes, there has been a lot of anti-chandra sentiments going on, both locally and overseas. But we stand by the fact that both parties have their own sides of the story, and we’re merely displaying the facts and dispelling the rumours.
Mike Ang said :
Interesting ! e27 in the forefront of the “Webarazzi”…investigative journalism on the Webopera ! Find out more…itls good to learrn some lessons from this Webisode.
Varun said :
Hey Mohan, not implying e27 is anti-Chandra. The comment was more generic in nature. :-)
Mohan Belani said :
@Varun: No worries, no offenses taken here or anything :)
socialwok said :
RT @e27sg Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo /via @e27sg
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Milinda said :
The question of who killed what will soon become irrelavant.
What will become evident in time is that there was no product delivered, regardless of who was in the wrong. i.e: nothing tangible was killed because there was nothing produced to the market to be killed.
The lesson for start ups here has to be to ignore the temptation to feel good because some web 2.0, crowdsourced, retweeted armchair bloggers say you have a “good idea” for a product and focus on getting a product out to market which paying customers says is a good product.
Setting aside the ethics of some of the actions Chandra is supposed to have taken, I think his biggest crime was to be complicit in building hype around a product that did not exist.
Somewhere along the line Web 2.0 has come to mean that if people are not tweeting your product or “Technorati” (people who know about technology only by reading about it) don’t say good things about it, then you do not have a product.
The CrunchPad has to be one of the most extreme cases of the PR tail wagging the Product dog. I suspect that the primary reason for much of the current issues are the fact that there is no product that has been produced which can live up to the hype generated. If there was a product delivered first, minus the hype, I’m sure Mike and Chandra would not be in this situation.
Andrew said :
Crunchpad is not dead. With a little African magic, it’s now JooJoo
http://www.mis-asia.com/news/articles/the-crunchpad-is-now-the-joojoo
But I like the U.S. coverage, which asks Mike about “the contract”. Mike’s a lawyer and he worked for 2 years on a project without a contract?!?
Twitted by LukeInTH said :
[...] This post was Twitted by LukeInTH [...]
Twitted by snehamenon said :
[...] This post was Twitted by snehamenon [...]
rochorbeancurd said :
(via @techxav): Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/54toE1
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
naelshawwa said :
RT @techxav: Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/54toE1
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
milsonng said :
Who Really Killed the Crunchpad? http://bit.ly/6TgdTo
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Twitted by rampok said :
[...] This post was Twitted by rampok [...]
Chin Hooi Yen said :
@Mohan and Varun. In fact, preference shares issued by a company ARE required to be filed with ACRA.